Agenda
March 11, 2007, 6:30 PM - 7:00 PM
Welcome Reception
McCormick & Schmick’s Seafood Restaurant, 533 W. 5th Street, Los Angeles
March 11, 2007, 7:00 PM - 9:30 PM
Opening Dinner and Keynote Address
Welcome and introductions.
- Vikki Porter, Director, Knight Digital Media Center, USC Annenberg School for Communication
- K.C. Cole, Visiting Professor/Science Journalism, USC Annenberg School of Journalism
- Michael Parks, Director, USC Annenberg School of Journalism
Conference plans
- Vikki Porter
Keynote address - “When Science and Policy Converge”
Presentation by:
- Donald Kennedy, editor-in-chief, Science Magazine, and president emeritus, Stanford University
March 12, 2007, 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM
What is Science, Anyway?
(And why do journalists have such a hard time getting editors and gatekeepers to understand it?)
What constitutes a discovery? What does “wrong” mean - or “true”? Dealing with uncertainty.
Opening discussants:
• Michael Lemonick, freelance journalist, writer “Eye on Science” blog, Time.com
• Alexandra Witze, Senior News and Features Editor, Nature
Presentation by:
- Donald Kennedy, editor-in-chief, Science Magazine, and president emeritus, Stanford University
March 12, 2007, 10:45 AM - 12:15 PM
The Landscape: Science Online
If 40 million Americans get their science information online, what are the implications for science journalists and news organizations focused on science? When science stories run on page one of newspapers, or get play on TV or radio, there is at least a chance that a non-science reader will be intrigued (not to mentioned informed). The transition to online has meant that readers (listeners, etc.) must go out and search for science. How do we get out of the box and bring back serendipity?
Presentation by:
- John B. Horrigan, associate research director, Pew Internet & American Life Project
- Rob Semper, executive associate director, San Francisco Exploratorium
March 12, 2007, 1:45 PM - 3:15 PM
Science Journalism in the Balance
The problem of “balance” in science journalism. Covering controversies.
Opening discussants:
• Cristine Russell, President, Council for the Advancement of Science Writing
• Tom Siegfried, freelance science journalist and member, Board of Directors, Council for the Advancement of Science Writing
• Joe Palca, Science Correspondent, National Public Radio
March 12, 2007, 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM
Invisible Issues in Science: Barbarians at the Gate
More and more science “news” is coming at us pre-filtered, selected by people who really don’t understand science. This situation inevitably results in more dumbed-down (and dumb) science journalism. The role of gatekeepers.
Opening discussants:
Charles Petit, MIT Knight Science Journalism Tracker
Dan Vergano, science writer, USA Today
Presentation by:
- Adam Frank, professor of astrophysics, University of Rochester
March 13, 2007, 9:00 AM - 11:00 AM
The New Tools: Story-telling Online
Given the discussions of the previous day, we overlay how science journalists can and should approach this complex discipline online. Story forms, use of audio, video, graphics, USG content/interaction.
Opening discussants:
• Daniel Grossman, AAAS award-winning journalist
• Vikki Valentine, Science Web Producer, National Public Radio
• Alan Boyle, Science Editor, MSNBC.com
• Sarah Graham, Science Web Producer, nytimes.com
Presentation by:
- Alfred Hermida, assistant professor, School of Journalism, University of British Columbia
March 13, 2007, 11:15 AM - 12:45 PM
Visual Science Journalism
Opening discussants:
• Rebecca Perry, professional graphic artist and visual journalist
• Larry Gonick, science cartoonist, Larry Gonick Studio
• Rosalind Reid, Editor, American Scientist magazine
March 13, 2007, 2:00 PM - 5:00 PM
Break-out Groups
Teams identify complex, controversial issues and brainstorm how to best cover them online. Teams are encouraged to use online tools or other materials to demonstrate how the topics could be presented in compelling and innovative forms.
March 14, 2007, 9:00 AM - 11:00 AM
Team Reports
Teams present their ideas for innovative online coverage of controversial or complex topics.
March 14, 2007, 11:15 AM - 12:15 PM
Best Practices: What have we learned?
Can we define best practices? How do we keep judgment and expertise in science journalism as it moves to cyberspace? Are there protocols that we can provide as guidelines for other journalists?
March 14, 2007, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
Closing Lunch
What can we take home from the last two days? How can it be realistically applied? Outlook for the future. Next steps.
